Thompson, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1517 (06 November 2025)

Thompson, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1517 (06 November 2025)

The applicant's role was properly assessed as leading due to his direct coordination of large-scale cocaine importation and distribution, with substantial influence and operational responsibility. The sentence imposed was consistent with the guidelines, reflected the scale of offending, and was not manifestly excessive when considering totality and statutory requirements.

Citation
[2025] EWCA Crim 1517
Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Peter Thompson
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 November 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Sentence
Outcome
renewed application for permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Drug Offences, Firearms Offences, Conspiracy, Totality Principle
Criminal Law Sentencing Drug Offences Firearms Offences Conspiracy Totality Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Peter Thompson

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in categorising the applicant as having a leading role in the conspiracy
  2. 2 Whether the total sentence imposed was manifestly excessive, particularly in light of the totality principle

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's role was properly assessed as leading due to his direct coordination of large-scale cocaine importation and distribution, with substantial influence and operational responsibility. The sentence imposed was consistent with the guidelines, reflected the scale of offending, and was not manifestly excessive when considering totality and statutory requirements.

Court Disposition

renewed application for permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is refused.