R. v Peter Weller [2009] EWCA Crim 1670 (16 July 2009)
Leave to appeal is granted on the ground that the jury may have been misled by expert evidence regarding the provenance of DNA, as Dr Bader's report undermines the scientific basis of the prosecution expert's opinion.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Crim 1670
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Peter Weller
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against conviction granted on the DNA evidence issue.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, DNA Evidence, Expert Evidence, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Peter Weller
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the expert DNA evidence presented at trial was reliable and within the proper bounds of expertise
- 2 Whether the jury was misled by expert evidence regarding the provenance of DNA found on the applicant's nail clippings
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal is granted on the ground that the jury may have been misled by expert evidence regarding the provenance of DNA, as Dr Bader's report undermines the scientific basis of the prosecution expert's opinion.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against conviction granted on the DNA evidence issue.
Orders
- Representation order for junior counsel only covering today's hearing, the adjourned hearing on 4 June, and the appeal itself.
- Any further directions to be applied for in writing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment