Rees & Anor v Peters
On the proper construction of clause 6(ii) of the 1957 Conveyance, the benefit of the restrictive covenant remains annexed to Farne House and is enforceable by successors in title, including Mr and Mrs Rees. The omission of the covenant from the Charges Register of Court Barn was a mistake, and rectification is just and appropriate as Mr Peters had actual notice of the covenant.
- Parties
- Appellants: Rees & Anr; Respondent: Peters
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Covenants, Rectification of Land Register, Construction of Conveyance, Successors in Title
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rees & Anr
Appellants
Peters
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the benefit of the restrictive covenant in clause 6(ii) of the 1957 Conveyance remained annexed to Farne House after its sale by the original purchasers
- 2 Whether the Charges Register of the registered title to Court Barn should be rectified to include the covenant
Ratio Decidendi
On the proper construction of clause 6(ii) of the 1957 Conveyance, the benefit of the restrictive covenant remains annexed to Farne House and is enforceable by successors in title, including Mr and Mrs Rees. The omission of the covenant from the Charges Register of Court Barn was a mistake, and rectification is just and appropriate as Mr Peters had actual notice of the covenant.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The benefit of the restrictive covenant in clause 6(ii) of the 1957 Conveyance is annexed to Farne House and enforceable by Mr and Mrs Rees against Mr Peters.
- The Charges Register of Title WSX155728 (Court Barn) shall be rectified to add reference to the covenant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment