[2009] EWHC 1088 (Comm)
In the absence of any inconsistent term, an FOB contract governed by English law contains an implied term under s.14(2) Sale of Goods Act 1979 and at common law that the goods must be of satisfactory quality and, if specified, remain within specification for a reasonable time after delivery. Clause 18, which excludes warranties but not conditions, does not preclude these implied terms.
- Parties
- Claimant: KG Bominflot Bunkergesellschaft Für Mineralöle mbh & Co KG; Defendant: Petroplus Marketing AG
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Trial of Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Preliminary issues answered: implied term exists under s.14(2) and at common law; s.14(3) term not implied; seller's obligations not limited to shipment; clause 18 does not exclude implied terms.
- Legal Topics
- Implied Terms, Satisfactory Quality, Fitness for Purpose, Contractual Exclusion Clauses, FOB Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KG Bominflot Bunkergesellschaft Für Mineralöle mbh & Co KG
Claimant
Petroplus Marketing AG
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Trial of Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is an implied term under s.14(2) Sale of Goods Act 1979 and/or at common law that goods delivered FOB must remain of satisfactory quality and/or in accordance with specification for a reasonable time after delivery
- 2 Whether s.14(3) Sale of Goods Act 1979 implies a term that goods must remain within specification for a reasonable time after delivery
- 3 Whether the seller's obligations are limited to compliance with specification at shipment FOB Antwerp
Ratio Decidendi
In the absence of any inconsistent term, an FOB contract governed by English law contains an implied term under s.14(2) Sale of Goods Act 1979 and at common law that the goods must be of satisfactory quality and, if specified, remain within specification for a reasonable time after delivery. Clause 18, which excludes warranties but not conditions, does not preclude these implied terms.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issues answered: implied term exists under s.14(2) and at common law; s.14(3) term not implied; seller's obligations not limited to shipment; clause 18 does not exclude implied terms.
Orders
- Implied term under s.14(2) Sale of Goods Act 1979 and at common law that gasoil must be of satisfactory quality and remain within specification for a reasonable time after delivery
- Clause 18 does not preclude implication of these terms
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment