Mayne Pharma PTY Ltd & Anor v Pharmacia Italia SPA

Mayne Pharma PTY Ltd & Anor v Pharmacia Italia SPA

The phrase 'which has not been reconstituted from a lyophilizate' in claim 1 refers to the final product, not the nature of the starting material. The patent is concerned with the provision of a stable, ready-to-use solution, and the skilled person would not regard the use of lyophilized raw material upstream as excluding the product from the claim. The appeal is allowed and non-infringement is not established.

Parties
Claimant: Mayne Pharma Pty Ltd; Claimant: Mayne Pharma plc; Defendant: Pharmacia Italia SPA
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 February 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Patent Construction, Non Infringement, Product by Process Claims

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mayne Pharma Pty Ltd

Claimant

Mayne Pharma plc

Claimant

Pharmacia Italia SPA

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Mayne's product infringes claim 1 of Pharmacia's UK patent No. 2,178,311
  2. 2 Proper construction of the phrase 'which has not been reconstituted from a lyophilizate' in claim 1

Ratio Decidendi

The phrase 'which has not been reconstituted from a lyophilizate' in claim 1 refers to the final product, not the nature of the starting material. The patent is concerned with the provision of a stable, ready-to-use solution, and the skilled person would not regard the use of lyophilized raw material upstream as excluding the product from the claim. The appeal is allowed and non-infringement is not established.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Appeal allowed
  • Assessment of costs to consider unnecessary documentation