Abbotsley Limited & Anor v Pheasantland Limited & Ors
Despite serious failures in disclosure and attempts to mislead the court by Ms Saunders, the court found that a fair trial was possible and all parties had opportunity to present their cases. The application to strike out was refused.
- Parties
- Claimant: Abbotsley Limited; Claimant: Vivien Inez Saunders; Defendant: Pheasantland Limited; Defendant: Keith Malcolm Blackall; Defendant: Christina Blackall; Defendant: John Alan Gearing; Defendant: Virginia Lynn Melesi; Defendant: Stephen John Newland; Defendant: Laurence Antony Honeywill; Defendant: Darren Honeywill; Defendant: Alan James Steele; Defendant: Valerie Anne Holliman; Defendant: Joy Carroll Seiler; Defendant: Neil Raymond Warren (Deceased); Defendant: Jeremy Charles Ian Brindley; Defendant: A person known as Colm; Defendant: Paul Brennan; Defendant: Carol Berwick
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application to Strike Out at End of Trial
- Outcome
- application to strike out refused
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out Application, Disclosure Obligations, Trespass, Harassment, Forfeiture of Lease, Fair Trial, Misleading the Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abbotsley Limited
Claimant
Vivien Inez Saunders
Claimant
Pheasantland Limited
Defendant
Keith Malcolm Blackall
Defendant
Christina Blackall
Defendant
John Alan Gearing
Defendant
Virginia Lynn Melesi
Defendant
Stephen John Newland
Defendant
Laurence Antony Honeywill
Defendant
Darren Honeywill
Defendant
Alan James Steele
Defendant
Valerie Anne Holliman
Defendant
Joy Carroll Seiler
Defendant
Neil Raymond Warren (Deceased)
Defendant
Jeremy Charles Ian Brindley
Defendant
A person known as Colm
Defendant
Paul Brennan
Defendant
Carol Berwick
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Strike Out at End of Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim should be struck out due to disclosure failures and misleading conduct
- 2 Whether the defendants received a fair trial
- 3 Whether the claimants complied with disclosure obligations
Ratio Decidendi
Despite serious failures in disclosure and attempts to mislead the court by Ms Saunders, the court found that a fair trial was possible and all parties had opportunity to present their cases. The application to strike out was refused.
Court Disposition
application to strike out refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment