Barton v Gwyn-Jones & Ors
The contract did not expressly exclude remuneration for a sale at less than £6.5 million; therefore, Mr Barton is entitled to reasonable compensation for the introduction, either by unjust enrichment or quantum meruit, assessed at 7.25% of the purchase price.
- Parties
- Appellant: Philip Barton; First Respondent: Timothy Gwyn-Jones; Second Respondent: Julie Swan; Third Respondent: Mark Phillips; Fourth Respondent: Foxpace Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Introduction Fee Agreements, Quantum Meruit, Implied Terms, Allocation of Risk, Valuation of Services
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip Barton
Appellant
Timothy Gwyn-Jones
First Respondent
Julie Swan
Second Respondent
Mark Phillips
Third Respondent
Foxpace Limited
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a contract for a specified introduction fee excludes remuneration if property is sold for less than the stipulated price
- 2 Whether a claim in unjust enrichment is barred by the principle in Macdonald Dickens & Macklin v Costello
- 3 Proper valuation of benefit conferred by introduction
Ratio Decidendi
The contract did not expressly exclude remuneration for a sale at less than £6.5 million; therefore, Mr Barton is entitled to reasonable compensation for the introduction, either by unjust enrichment or quantum meruit, assessed at 7.25% of the purchase price.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Mr Barton is entitled to £435,000 as reasonable remuneration for the introduction of the purchaser.
- No entitlement to £1.2 million as per original contract.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment