Booth v Mond
Arrears under the income payments agreement are a provable debt for the purposes of the IVA, the trustee in bankruptcy is a creditor entitled to participate in the IVA for voting and dividend purposes, and the arrears fall within the scope of the IVA.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Philip Booth; Respondent: David Emanuel Mond
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (insolvency) / Judgment on Application for Directions Under Section 263(4) Insolvency Act 1986
- Outcome
- Application allowed; trustee in bankruptcy entitled to be included in the IVA for voting and dividend purposes.
- Legal Topics
- Individual Voluntary Arrangement (iva), Income Payments Agreement, Provable Debts, Bankruptcy, Trustee in Bankruptcy
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip Booth
Applicant
David Emanuel Mond
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil (insolvency) / Judgment on Application for Directions Under Section 263(4) Insolvency Act 1986
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether arrears under an income payments agreement constitute a provable debt in an IVA
- 2 Whether the trustee in bankruptcy is a creditor entitled to participate in the IVA
- 3 Whether the arrears can be compromised within the IVA
Ratio Decidendi
Arrears under the income payments agreement are a provable debt for the purposes of the IVA, the trustee in bankruptcy is a creditor entitled to participate in the IVA for voting and dividend purposes, and the arrears fall within the scope of the IVA.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; trustee in bankruptcy entitled to be included in the IVA for voting and dividend purposes.
Orders
- Trustee in bankruptcy to be included within the IVA for voting and dividend purposes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment