R v Philip Burdett

R v Philip Burdett

The sentencing judge correctly categorised the offence as medium culpability, as none of the factors for lower culpability were present, and was entitled to treat the continued lack of care after death became inevitable as aggravating. The sentence of three years' imprisonment was neither wrong in principle nor...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Philip Burdett
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 February 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Gross Negligence Manslaughter, Sentencing, Culpability Assessment, Mitigating and Aggravating Factors
Criminal Law Gross Negligence Manslaughter Sentencing Culpability Assessment Mitigating and Aggravating Factors

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Philip Burdett

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in categorising the offence as medium culpability under the Sentencing Council guideline for gross negligence manslaughter
  2. 2 Whether the judge was wrong to treat as an aggravating factor the failure to provide proper care after death became inevitable

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge correctly categorised the offence as medium culpability, as none of the factors for lower culpability were present, and was entitled to treat the continued lack of care after death became inevitable as aggravating. The sentence of three years' imprisonment was neither wrong in principle nor manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal against sentence is dismissed.