Promar International Ltd. v Clarke
The judge was entitled, following the guidance in BCT Software, to make no order as to costs where the substantive issues were resolved without a trial and it was not possible to determine who was the winner or loser. There was no manifest injustice in the judge's decision, and both parties were responsible for the case proceeding to trial without settlement of costs.
- Parties
- Claimant: Promar International Limited; Defendant: Philip Clarke
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision on Costs
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Restrictive Covenants, Settlement, Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Promar International Limited
Claimant
Philip Clarke
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision on Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in making no order as to costs after the substantive issues were resolved by undertaking and abandonment of damages claim
- 2 Whether the guidance in BCT Software Solutions Ltd v C Brewer and Sons Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 939 applied to the circumstances of this case
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled, following the guidance in BCT Software, to make no order as to costs where the substantive issues were resolved without a trial and it was not possible to determine who was the winner or loser. There was no manifest injustice in the judge's decision, and both parties were responsible for the case proceeding to trial without settlement of costs.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs; each party to bear its own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment