Crowe & Anor, Re [2008] EWLands LP_34_2006 (15 April 2008)
The restrictive covenant does not secure any practical benefit of substantial value to the objectors, and the proposed shed will not injure them; the modification is therefore granted under section 84(1)(aa) and (c) of the Law of Property Act 1925.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] EWLands LP_34_2006
- Parties
- Applicant: Philip Crowe; Applicant: Alison Heaton; Objector: John Alan Massey; Objector: Maureen Mary Massey
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 / Final Decision on Application for Modification of Restrictive Covenant
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Covenants, Modification of Covenants, Land Use, Planning Permission
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip Crowe
Applicant
Alison Heaton
Applicant
John Alan Massey
Objector
Maureen Mary Massey
Objector
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 / Final Decision on Application for Modification of Restrictive Covenant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the restrictive covenant preventing erection of permanent structures without seller's consent should be modified to permit erection of a large garden shed
- 2 Whether the restriction is obsolete
- 3 Whether the beneficiaries of the restriction have agreed to its modification
Ratio Decidendi
The restrictive covenant does not secure any practical benefit of substantial value to the objectors, and the proposed shed will not injure them; the modification is therefore granted under section 84(1)(aa) and (c) of the Law of Property Act 1925.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- The restrictive covenant is modified to permit erection of the proposed shed on the existing concrete base in the south-east corner of Hafod, and subsequent erection of replacement sheds in the same position, subject to conditions: (1) replacement sheds must not be materially larger than the current shed; (2) the...
- No compensation is payable to the objectors.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment