Bell v Long & Ors

Bell v Long & Ors

The receivers and their agents did not breach their duty to the company. The decision to proceed with a portfolio sale was a reasonable and competent strategy in the circumstances, supported by expert evidence and justified by the offers received and market conditions. There was no negligence or breach of duty, and...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Mr Philip Graham Bell; Defendant: Philip James Long; Defendant: Andrew William Thompson; Defendant: Pannell Kerr Forster (a firm); Defendant: Weatherall Green & Smith North Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 June 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Duties of Receivers, Sale of Mortgaged Property, Breach of Duty, Negligence, Valuation of Property, Portfolio Sale, Conspiracy, Fraud (abandoned)
Equity Property Law Insolvency Duties of Receivers Sale of Mortgaged Property Breach of Duty Negligence Valuation of Property +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Philip Graham Bell

Claimant

Philip James Long

Defendant

Andrew William Thompson

Defendant

Pannell Kerr Forster (a firm)

Defendant

Weatherall Green & Smith North Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the receivers breached their duty to obtain the best price reasonably obtainable for the company's properties
  2. 2 Whether the decision to sell the properties as a portfolio rather than individually was negligent
  3. 3 Whether there was a conspiracy to defraud the company by selling at an undervalue (abandoned)

Ratio Decidendi

The receivers and their agents did not breach their duty to the company. The decision to proceed with a portfolio sale was a reasonable and competent strategy in the circumstances, supported by expert evidence and justified by the offers received and market conditions. There was no negligence or breach of duty, and no evidence of conspiracy or fraud.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • The claim against the receivers is dismissed.