Pelling v Johnson [2004] EWHC 492 (QB) (16 March 2004)

Pelling v Johnson [2004] EWHC 492 (QB) (16 March 2004)

The defendant, Mr Johnson, intentionally made physical contact with Dr Pelling by taking hold of him, which constituted the tort of assault as there was no lawful justification. However, there was no evidence of bad faith or recklessness sufficient to establish misfeasance in public office, and no breach of Article 8 rights was found.

Citation
[2004] EWHC 492 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Michael John Pelling; Defendant: Philip Johnson
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Tort Claim / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claimant succeeds in assault; other claims dismissed.
Legal Topics
Assault, Misfeasance in Public Office, Article 8 ECHR, Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael John Pelling

Claimant

Philip Johnson

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Tort Claim / Judgment After Trial

  1. 1 Whether the defendant committed the tort of assault against the claimant
  2. 2 Whether the defendant committed misfeasance in public office
  3. 3 Whether the defendant breached the claimant's rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant, Mr Johnson, intentionally made physical contact with Dr Pelling by taking hold of him, which constituted the tort of assault as there was no lawful justification. However, there was no evidence of bad faith or recklessness sufficient to establish misfeasance in public office, and no breach of Article 8 rights was found.

Court Disposition

Claimant succeeds in assault; other claims dismissed.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay claimant £50 in damages for assault.
  • No aggravated or exemplary damages awarded.