Singh v Sinel

Singh v Sinel

The judge had sufficient evidence to summarily assess the quantum of counsel's fees, applied a reasonable reduction to the disputed sum, and exercised proper discretion in accordance with the overriding objective. There was no error in the summary judgment or assessment process.

Parties
Claimant: Kuldip Singh QC; Defendant: Philip Sinel (T/A Sinels Advocates)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Quantum Meruit, Summary Judgment, Assessment of Counsel's Fees
Contract Law Costs and Fees Quantum Meruit Summary Judgment Assessment of Counsel's Fees

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kuldip Singh QC

Claimant

Philip Sinel (T/A Sinels Advocates)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judge erred in summarily assessing counsel's fees against the defendant
  2. 2 Whether there was sufficient material before the judge to assess quantum
  3. 3 Whether the judge properly exercised summary assessment or failed to give reasons

Ratio Decidendi

The judge had sufficient evidence to summarily assess the quantum of counsel's fees, applied a reasonable reduction to the disputed sum, and exercised proper discretion in accordance with the overriding objective. There was no error in the summary judgment or assessment process.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; judgment for claimant in the sum of £102,307.20