Coates, R v Rev 1 [2007] EWCA Crim 1471 (22 June 2007)
The conviction is unsafe because it was based on a statement disavowed by the complainant, whose oral testimony and post-therapy evidence were found unreliable. The directions to the Board were insufficient given the unusual circumstances, and overall fairness required exclusion of the first statement as a basis for conviction.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Crim 1471
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Appellant: Phillip Coates
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- conviction quashed
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Admissibility of Evidence, Fair Trial, Abuse of Process, Memory Reliability, Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
Phillip Coates
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conviction for rape based on complainant's first statement is safe when complainant disavowed it in oral testimony
- 2 Admissibility and reliability of complainant's statements post-therapy
- 3 Impact of section 119 and 120 Criminal Justice Act 2003 and section 78 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 on evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction is unsafe because it was based on a statement disavowed by the complainant, whose oral testimony and post-therapy evidence were found unreliable. The directions to the Board were insufficient given the unusual circumstances, and overall fairness required exclusion of the first statement as a basis for conviction.
Court Disposition
conviction quashed
Orders
- conviction for rape quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment