Gallarotti v Sebastianelli
The express agreement for equal shares was qualified by the parties' understanding that contributions would be balanced over time. Since Mr Gallarotti did not make the promised mortgage repayments, the agreement for equal shares did not apply. Beneficial ownership should reflect actual financial contributions, resulting in a 75% share for Mr Sebastianelli and 25% for Mr Gallarotti.
- Parties
- Applicant: Pietro Gallarotti; Respondent: Fabio Sebastianelli
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; Recorder's finding of equal shares set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Common Intention Constructive Trust, Beneficial Ownership, Joint Property Acquisition, Oral Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pietro Gallarotti
Applicant
Fabio Sebastianelli
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the parties were beneficially entitled to the flat in equal shares or in proportion to their contributions
- 2 Whether an express oral agreement for equal shares was qualified by subsequent conduct and contributions
Ratio Decidendi
The express agreement for equal shares was qualified by the parties' understanding that contributions would be balanced over time. Since Mr Gallarotti did not make the promised mortgage repayments, the agreement for equal shares did not apply. Beneficial ownership should reflect actual financial contributions, resulting in a 75% share for Mr Sebastianelli and 25% for Mr Gallarotti.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; Recorder's finding of equal shares set aside.
Orders
- Mr Sebastianelli has a 75% beneficial share in the flat.
- Mr Gallarotti has a 25% beneficial share in the flat.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment