Piffs Elm Limited, R (on the application of) v Commission for Local Administration in England & Anor.
The Ombudsman had no express or implied statutory power to withdraw decision 1 after completing the investigation; decision 1 was unlawful as it was made without jurisdiction due to the existence of an alternative remedy in court; decision 3 was lawful as the Ombudsman correctly declined jurisdiction.
- Parties
- Appellant: Piffs Elm Limited; First Respondent: Commission for Local Administration in England; Second Respondent: Tewkesbury Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Maladministration, Ombudsman Powers, Functus Officio, Statutory Interpretation, Planning Law, Alternative Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Piffs Elm Limited
Appellant
Commission for Local Administration in England
First Respondent
Tewkesbury Borough Council
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Ombudsman had power to withdraw a final report (decision 1)
- 2 Whether decision 1 was unlawful
- 3 Whether decision 3 was lawful
Ratio Decidendi
The Ombudsman had no express or implied statutory power to withdraw decision 1 after completing the investigation; decision 1 was unlawful as it was made without jurisdiction due to the existence of an alternative remedy in court; decision 3 was lawful as the Ombudsman correctly declined jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal by Piffs Elm Limited dismissed
- No order as to further relief
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment