Butcher & Anor v Pike & Ors [2020] EWHC 3362 (QB) (07 December 2020)
The court held that the contract did not reflect the parties' true intentions due to a common mistake and ordered rectification to align the contract with the parties' actual agreement.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 3362 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Butcher; Defendant: Pike
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Contract, Rectification, Mistake
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Butcher
Claimant
Pike
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the contract should be rectified due to mistake
- 2 Proper interpretation of the contract terms
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the contract did not reflect the parties' true intentions due to a common mistake and ordered rectification to align the contract with the parties' actual agreement.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- The contract is rectified to reflect the parties' true intentions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment