Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and another v Smith

Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and another v Smith

Mr Smith was a limb (b) worker under section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, obliged to perform work personally, with only a limited right to substitute another Pimlico operative, and Pimlico was not a client or customer; the tribunal was entitled to find worker status and employment under the Equality Act.

Parties
Appellant: Pimlico Plumbers Ltd; Appellant: Mr Mullins; Respondent: Mr Smith
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 June 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Worker Status, Personal Performance, Client or Customer Test, Umbrella Contract, Statutory Protection, Disability Discrimination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pimlico Plumbers Ltd

Appellant

Mr Mullins

Appellant

Mr Smith

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Mr Smith was a 'worker' within the meaning of section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
  2. 2 Whether Mr Smith was in 'employment' under section 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010
  3. 3 Whether Pimlico Plumbers Ltd was a client or customer of Mr Smith

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Smith was a limb (b) worker under section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, obliged to perform work personally, with only a limited right to substitute another Pimlico operative, and Pimlico was not a client or customer; the tribunal was entitled to find worker status and employment under the Equality Act.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Mr Smith's substantive claims as a limb (b) worker may proceed to be heard in the tribunal