Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and another v Smith
Mr Smith was a limb (b) worker under section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, obliged to perform work personally, with only a limited right to substitute another Pimlico operative, and Pimlico was not a client or customer; the tribunal was entitled to find worker status and employment under the Equality Act.
- Parties
- Appellant: Pimlico Plumbers Ltd; Appellant: Mr Mullins; Respondent: Mr Smith
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Worker Status, Personal Performance, Client or Customer Test, Umbrella Contract, Statutory Protection, Disability Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd
Appellant
Mr Mullins
Appellant
Mr Smith
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Smith was a 'worker' within the meaning of section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- 2 Whether Mr Smith was in 'employment' under section 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010
- 3 Whether Pimlico Plumbers Ltd was a client or customer of Mr Smith
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Smith was a limb (b) worker under section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, obliged to perform work personally, with only a limited right to substitute another Pimlico operative, and Pimlico was not a client or customer; the tribunal was entitled to find worker status and employment under the Equality Act.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Mr Smith's substantive claims as a limb (b) worker may proceed to be heard in the tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment