Olejarczyk, R. v

Olejarczyk, R. v

The extraneous material introduced by the jury foreman regarding Polish military service did not affect the fairness or safety of the conviction, as it was irrelevant to the issues the jury had to decide and there was no evidence it influenced the verdict.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Piotr Olejarczyk
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 March 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal against conviction refused
Legal Topics
Jury Misconduct, Appeal Against Conviction, Murder, Extraneous Material, Juries Act Offences
Criminal Law Jury Misconduct Appeal Against Conviction Murder Extraneous Material Juries Act Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Piotr Olejarczyk

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the jury foreman's misconduct rendered the conviction unsafe
  2. 2 Whether extraneous material introduced by the jury foreman affected the fairness of the trial

Ratio Decidendi

The extraneous material introduced by the jury foreman regarding Polish military service did not affect the fairness or safety of the conviction, as it was irrelevant to the issues the jury had to decide and there was no evidence it influenced the verdict.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal against conviction refused