Revenue and Customs, R (on the application of) v Pisciotto
A caution under Code C10 of PACE is not required when questioning is for civil forfeiture proceedings and not for criminal prosecution; section 78 of PACE does not apply to civil proceedings under POCA; the exclusion of evidence by the court below was incorrect and is quashed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Commissioners of Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs; Defendant: Pisciotto
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- ruling quashed
- Legal Topics
- Caution Requirements, Admissibility of Evidence, Application of PACE in Civil Proceedings, POCA Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioners of Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Claimant
Pisciotto
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a caution must be administered under Code C10 of PACE when questioning for civil forfeiture proceedings
- 2 Whether answers or silence given in civil proceedings require a caution under Code C10
- 3 Whether failure to inform the respondent that answers would only be used in civil proceedings affects the caution requirement
Ratio Decidendi
A caution under Code C10 of PACE is not required when questioning is for civil forfeiture proceedings and not for criminal prosecution; section 78 of PACE does not apply to civil proceedings under POCA; the exclusion of evidence by the court below was incorrect and is quashed.
Court Disposition
ruling quashed
Orders
- The ruling of the court below excluding the further evidence of the customs officer is quashed.
- No other order is sought or necessary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment