PJV v The Assistant Director Adult Social Care Newcastle City Council & Anor
Where CICA, in the proper exercise of its powers under the relevant scheme, decides an award should be held on trust and paid to trustees, the applicant (even if lacking capacity) never becomes entitled to the award moneys as property; thus, a deputy can finalise the award and trust without a further order of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: PJV; First Respondent: The Assistant Director Adult Social Care Newcastle City Council; Second Respondent: The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Powers of Deputy Under Mental Capacity Act, Settlement of Compensation Awards, Court of Protection Jurisdiction, Criminal Injuries Compensation, Trust Creation for Incapacitated Persons
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PJV
Appellant
The Assistant Director Adult Social Care Newcastle City Council
First Respondent
The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Protection must make a further order to establish a trust for a CICA award when the applicant lacks capacity
- 2 Whether a deputy can finalise a CICA award to be held on trust without a further court order
- 3 Interpretation of s. 20(3)(a) and (c) of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 regarding settlement of property and exercise of powers
Ratio Decidendi
Where CICA, in the proper exercise of its powers under the relevant scheme, decides an award should be held on trust and paid to trustees, the applicant (even if lacking capacity) never becomes entitled to the award moneys as property; thus, a deputy can finalise the award and trust without a further order of the Court of Protection. The process does not involve a settlement of P’s property or the exercise of a power precluded by s. 20(3) of the MCA.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- No further application to the Court of Protection is required to finalise a CICA award to be held on trust where CICA so determines; a deputy can finalise the award and trust on behalf of P.
- Parties invited to negotiate further on trust terms, deputy appointment, and Peters undertaking; directions to be given if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment