W Harold John (Metals) Ltd & Anor v Arthur Gait & Co (A Firm) [1999] EWCA Civ 1264 (26 April 1999)
Security for costs is appropriate in this substantial accountants' negligence appeal; the reasonable sum for security is £75,000, reflecting necessary solicitor and counsel fees and preparation costs, without excess or duplication.
- Citation
- [1999] EWCA Civ 1264
- Parties
- Applicant: Plaintiffs; Respondent: Defendants
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Accountants' Negligence Action / Application for Security for Costs on Appeal
- Outcome
- Security for costs ordered; appeal stayed pending payment; appeal dismissed if security not provided.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Costs Assessment, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiffs
Applicant
Defendants
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Accountants' Negligence Action / Application for Security for Costs on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered on appeal
- 2 What is the reasonable amount for security for costs
Ratio Decidendi
Security for costs is appropriate in this substantial accountants' negligence appeal; the reasonable sum for security is £75,000, reflecting necessary solicitor and counsel fees and preparation costs, without excess or duplication.
Court Disposition
Security for costs ordered; appeal stayed pending payment; appeal dismissed if security not provided.
Orders
- Security for costs in the sum of £75,000 to be paid into court within 28 days or by other agreed mechanism.
- Appeal stayed in the meantime.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment