Magauran, R (on the application of) v The First Secretary of State & Ors
The inspector did not err in law; demolition of the house would not normally require separate planning permission, and no Article 4 direction was sought by the council. The inspector's reasoning and application of material considerations were lawful and within her discretion.
- Parties
- Claimant: Miss Helen Magauran; First Defendant: The First Secretary of State; Second Defendant: Epsom & Ewell Borough Council; Third Defendant: Mr John Henry Magauran
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Planning Permission, Demolition of Locally Listed Buildings, Statutory Interpretation, Natural Justice, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss Helen Magauran
Claimant
The First Secretary of State
First Defendant
Epsom & Ewell Borough Council
Second Defendant
Mr John Henry Magauran
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the planning inspector erred in law by granting permission for development following demolition of a locally listed building
- 2 Whether the inspector took into account irrelevant or immaterial considerations
- 3 Whether there was a breach of natural justice in the hearing process
Ratio Decidendi
The inspector did not err in law; demolition of the house would not normally require separate planning permission, and no Article 4 direction was sought by the council. The inspector's reasoning and application of material considerations were lawful and within her discretion.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim dismissed
- Claimant to pay First Secretary of State's costs, assessed at £6,250, within 28 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment