McCleave, R (on the application of) v Canterbury City Council
The claimant's sole argument regarding established land use rights for a small area was not raised at the inquiry, involved new evidence inadmissible at this stage, and would not have affected the outcome. The Inspector's decision was correct in law and procedure.
- Parties
- Claimant: P McCleave; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Canterbury City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review and Statutory Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Planning Permission, Enforcement Notices, Capacity to Conduct Proceedings, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P McCleave
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Canterbury City Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review and Statutory Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Inspector erred in dismissing the appeal against refusal of planning permission for change of use to dwelling
- 2 Whether the Inspector failed to recognise established land use rights for a small area of the site
- 3 Whether the Inspector's conduct of the inquiry was improper
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's sole argument regarding established land use rights for a small area was not raised at the inquiry, involved new evidence inadmissible at this stage, and would not have affected the outcome. The Inspector's decision was correct in law and procedure.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Claimant to pay first defendant's costs assessed at £5,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment