Nintendo Company Ltd & Anor v Playables Ltd & Anor
The defendants' devices circumvented effective technological measures applied to Nintendo DS games, infringing copyright under section 296ZD. The devices also constituted means for unauthorised circumvention of technical devices applied to computer programs under section 296, and the defendants knew or had reason to believe the devices would be used for infringement. The second defendant was jointly liable as the controlling mind of the first defendant. No defence raised had a realistic prospect of success. Summary judgment was granted except as to export sales under section 296 and certain copyright claims where triable issues remained.
- Parties
- Claimant: Nintendo Company Limited; Claimant: Nintendo of Europe GmbH; Defendant: Playables Limited; Defendant: Wai Dat Chan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Intellectual Property / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted in part for the claimants
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Infringement, Technological Protection Measures, Summary Judgment, Joint Tortfeasor Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nintendo Company Limited
Claimant
Nintendo of Europe GmbH
Claimant
Playables Limited
Defendant
Wai Dat Chan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Intellectual Property / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants infringed copyright by dealing in devices circumventing Nintendo's copy-protection measures
- 2 Whether the devices circumvented effective technological measures under section 296ZD of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988
- 3 Whether the defendants' actions infringed section 296 of the Act relating to technical devices applied to computer programs
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants' devices circumvented effective technological measures applied to Nintendo DS games, infringing copyright under section 296ZD. The devices also constituted means for unauthorised circumvention of technical devices applied to computer programs under section 296, and the defendants knew or had reason to believe the devices would be used for infringement. The second defendant was jointly liable as the controlling mind of the first defendant. No defence raised had a realistic prospect of success. Summary judgment was granted except as to export sales under section 296 and certain copyright claims where triable issues remained.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted in part for the claimants
Orders
- Summary judgment for Nintendo under section 296ZD for all relevant dealings, including export sales
- Summary judgment for Nintendo under section 296 except for export sales
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment