The Ministry of Justice v Prison Officers Association (POA)

The Ministry of Justice v Prison Officers Association (POA)

The Defendant's admitted breach and threatened further breach of the JIRPA entitle the Claimant to an injunction. The Claimant's conduct in staging the pay award for reasons including affordability was consistent with its stated position and does not amount to inequitable conduct sufficient to bar equitable relief. The alleged insufficiency of compensatory measures under international law does not amount to unclean hands, as the relevant treaties are not incorporated into English law and the compensatory measures in place are the result of negotiation and statute. There is a strong public interest in granting the injunction given the serious consequences of industrial action by prison...

Parties
Claimant: The Ministry of Justice; Defendant: POA
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Continuation of Interim Injunction
Outcome
Injunction granted
Legal Topics
Industrial Action, Injunctions, No Strike Agreements, Equitable Remedies, Compensatory Measures, International Labour Standards
Employment Law Contract Law Equity Industrial Action Injunctions No Strike Agreements Equitable Remedies Compensatory Measures +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Ministry of Justice

Claimant

POA

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application for Continuation of Interim Injunction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to an injunction restraining the Defendant from organising industrial action in breach of the JIRPA agreement
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant's conduct disentitles it to equitable relief on the basis of unclean hands due to alleged failure to provide adequate compensatory measures for the prohibition on strike action

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant's admitted breach and threatened further breach of the JIRPA entitle the Claimant to an injunction. The Claimant's conduct in staging the pay award for reasons including affordability was consistent with its stated position and does not amount to inequitable conduct sufficient to bar equitable relief. The alleged insufficiency of compensatory measures under international law does not amount to unclean hands, as the relevant treaties are not incorporated into English law and the compensatory measures in place are the result of negotiation and statute. There is a strong public interest in granting the injunction given the serious consequences of industrial action by prison...

Court Disposition

Injunction granted

Orders

  • The interim injunction restraining the Defendant from organising industrial action in breach of the JIRPA is to continue until 8 May 2008.