Baker v Police Appeals Tribunal
The Tribunal was functus officio after issuing its Original Order and Statement of Determination; it had no power to amend its decision. The Amended Order was ultra vires and must be quashed. The reasons advanced for refusing to quash the order are not permissible grounds for withholding relief.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Patrick George Baker; Defendant: Police Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Amended Order quashed; costs awarded to claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Functus Officio, Judicial Review Remedies, Jurisdiction, Police Misconduct, Back Pay, Discretion in Quashing Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick George Baker
Claimant
Police Appeals Tribunal
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Police Appeals Tribunal had jurisdiction to amend its original order after becoming functus officio
- 2 Whether the amended order should be quashed despite the Tribunal's intention to rectify a mistake
- 3 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to refuse a quashing order to avoid perceived injustice
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was functus officio after issuing its Original Order and Statement of Determination; it had no power to amend its decision. The Amended Order was ultra vires and must be quashed. The reasons advanced for refusing to quash the order are not permissible grounds for withholding relief.
Court Disposition
Amended Order quashed; costs awarded to claimant.
Orders
- The Amended Order of the Tribunal dated 30 June 2011 is quashed.
- The Tribunal shall pay Mr Baker’s costs of these proceedings on the standard basis, summarily assessed at £20,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment