Strzyzewski v Polish Judicial Authority [2012] EWHC 3240 (Admin) (30 October 2012)
The grounds advanced by the appellant were not properly arguable as they were not raised below, lacked credible evidence, and did not meet the threshold for new evidence on appeal. Article 8 considerations did not outweigh the public interest in extradition.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 3240 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Strzyzewski; Defendant: Polish Judicial Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal Against Extradition Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- European Arrest Warrant, Article 8 ECHR, Procedural Fairness, New Evidence on Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Strzyzewski
Claimant
Polish Judicial Authority
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Extradition Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal Against Extradition Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had already served the sentence for the first offence under the first warrant
- 2 Whether the appellant was present at the proceedings for the third offence under the first warrant
- 3 Whether Article 8 ECHR considerations outweigh the public interest in extradition
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds advanced by the appellant were not properly arguable as they were not raised below, lacked credible evidence, and did not meet the threshold for new evidence on appeal. Article 8 considerations did not outweigh the public interest in extradition.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Extradition orders confirmed
- Assessment of costs order granted to claimant's counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment