Primus Build Ltd v Pompey Centre Ltd & Anor
The adjudicator's decision was unenforceable because he based his award on a calculation derived from Primus's accounts, which both parties had agreed were irrelevant, and did so without giving the parties an opportunity to address this new basis, amounting to a material breach of natural justice and/or excess of jurisdiction.
- Parties
- Claimant: Primus Build Limited; Defendant: Pompey Centre Limited; Defendant: Slidesilver Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Construction Contract Enforcement / Judgment on Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision
- Outcome
- Application for enforcement of the adjudicator's decision dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Service of Notice, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Natural Justice, Costs in Adjudication
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Primus Build Limited
Claimant
Pompey Centre Limited
Defendant
Slidesilver Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Construction Contract Enforcement / Judgment on Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether service of the Notice of Adjudication was valid under the contract
- 2 Whether the adjudicator exceeded jurisdiction or breached natural justice by relying on a basis not advanced by the parties
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator's decision was unenforceable because he based his award on a calculation derived from Primus's accounts, which both parties had agreed were irrelevant, and did so without giving the parties an opportunity to address this new basis, amounting to a material breach of natural justice and/or excess of jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Application for enforcement of the adjudicator's decision dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment