Bromford Corinthia Housing Association v Mohammed & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 90 (29 January 2001)
There were no arguable grounds to support the proposed appeal as the arrears were unlikely to be paid off and the tenant's financial difficulties and benefit issues did not justify suspension or appeal; thus, permission to appeal was refused.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 90
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Bromford Corinthia Housing Association; Defendants/applicants: Mr and Mrs Mohammed
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Possession Proceedings, Suspension of Warrant, Housing Benefit, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bromford Corinthia Housing Association
Claimant/respondent
Mr and Mrs Mohammed
Defendants/applicants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to appeal against refusal to suspend warrant for possession should be granted
- 2 Whether new financial circumstances justify suspension or appeal
Ratio Decidendi
There were no arguable grounds to support the proposed appeal as the arrears were unlikely to be paid off and the tenant's financial difficulties and benefit issues did not justify suspension or appeal; thus, permission to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment