Raglan Housing Association Ltd. v Fairclough
Ground 14(b)(ii) of Schedule 2 to the Housing Act 1988 is not limited to offences committed during the currency of the tenancy; it applies to convictions for indictable offences committed in the locality before the tenancy commenced. The judge's decision to grant possession was correct as both statutory grounds were established and it was reasonable to make the order.
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Raglan Housing Association Ltd; Appellant/respondent: Alex Patrick Fairclough
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Possession Proceedings, Statutory Interpretation, Grounds for Possession, Criminal Convictions and Tenancy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raglan Housing Association Ltd
Respondent/claimant
Alex Patrick Fairclough
Appellant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does Ground 14(b)(ii) of Schedule 2 to the Housing Act 1988 apply to convictions for offences committed before the commencement of the tenancy?
- 2 Is it reasonable to grant possession based on the established grounds?
Ratio Decidendi
Ground 14(b)(ii) of Schedule 2 to the Housing Act 1988 is not limited to offences committed during the currency of the tenancy; it applies to convictions for indictable offences committed in the locality before the tenancy commenced. The judge's decision to grant possession was correct as both statutory grounds were established and it was reasonable to make the order.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; order for possession stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment