Jaqueline Casey & Ors v Environment Agency
The Environment Agency, as owner of the riverbed, is entitled to possession proceedings against boat owners moored without permission; riparian rights do not confer permanent mooring; the possession order is proportionate and does not unlawfully interfere with navigation or Article 8 rights; no public law defence or procedural irregularity bars the claim.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Mrs Jacqueline Casey; Appellant/defendant: Mr John Casey; Appellant/defendant: Mr Sergiu Sidei; Appellant/defendant: Mr Erion Gjika; Appellant/defendant: Mr Fatmir Kastrati; Appellant/defendant: Mrs Frances Laugenie; Appellant/defendant: Mr Stephen Cross; Respondent/claimant: Environment Agency
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Possession Proceedings, Trespass, Riparian Rights, Public Right of Navigation, Duty of Candour, Proportionality, ECHR Article 8, Ultra Vires, Adverse Possession
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Jacqueline Casey
Appellant/defendant
Mr John Casey
Appellant/defendant
Mr Sergiu Sidei
Appellant/defendant
Mr Erion Gjika
Appellant/defendant
Mr Fatmir Kastrati
Appellant/defendant
Mrs Frances Laugenie
Appellant/defendant
Mr Stephen Cross
Appellant/defendant
Environment Agency
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant as owner of the riverbed can bring possession proceedings against boat owners moored above it
- 2 Whether riparian rights or licences entitle defendants to permanent mooring
- 3 Whether the possession order interferes with public navigation rights
Ratio Decidendi
The Environment Agency, as owner of the riverbed, is entitled to possession proceedings against boat owners moored without permission; riparian rights do not confer permanent mooring; the possession order is proportionate and does not unlawfully interfere with navigation or Article 8 rights; no public law defence or procedural irregularity bars the claim.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Possession order upheld over specified areas of riverbed excluding areas occupied by licence or consent
- Declaration that Environment Agency as riverbed owner may bring possession proceedings for trespass against vessel owners even if not owner of bank; defendants' rights limited to public right of navigation under s.79 Thames Conservancy Act 1932
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment