Bates & Ors v Post Office Ltd (No 2)
The defendant failed to satisfy the heavy burden required to strike out evidence at the interlocutory stage. The challenged evidence may be relevant or sufficiently helpful to the Common Issues, particularly given the nature of group litigation, the pleaded issues, and the defendant's own evidence and pleadings. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Alan Bates and Others; Defendant: Post Office Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Group Litigation / Interlocutory Application (application to Strike Out Evidence)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Evidence, Group Litigation Orders, Contractual Construction, Agency Principles, Burden of Proof
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Bates and Others
Claimant
Post Office Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Group Litigation / Interlocutory Application (application to Strike Out Evidence)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether large passages of claimants' witness statements should be struck out as irrelevant to the Common Issues trial
- 2 Whether the challenged evidence is admissible and relevant to the Common Issues
- 3 Whether the evidence should be excluded on grounds of proportionality, fairness, or case management
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant failed to satisfy the heavy burden required to strike out evidence at the interlocutory stage. The challenged evidence may be relevant or sufficiently helpful to the Common Issues, particularly given the nature of group litigation, the pleaded issues, and the defendant's own evidence and pleadings. The application to strike out is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The defendant's application to strike out passages of the claimants' evidence is dismissed.
- Costs arguments to be dealt with at the first hearing day of the trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment