Bates & Ors v Post Office Ltd (No 4) [2019] EWHC 871 (QB) (09 April 2019)
The judge found that the legal test for apparent bias was not satisfied; the fair-minded and informed observer would not conclude there was a real possibility of bias based on the passages and conduct cited. The judge's comments and findings were within the scope of his judicial function, and continuity in group...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 871
- Parties
- Claimant: Alan Bates and Others; Defendant: Post Office Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Group Litigation Order (glo) / Recusal Application During Ongoing Trial (horizon Issues)
- Outcome
- Recusal application dismissed; judge will continue as Managing Judge.
- Legal Topics
- Apparent Bias, Recusal of Judge, Case Management, Group Litigation Order, Horizon System Litigation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Bates and Others
Claimant
Post Office Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Group Litigation Order (glo) / Recusal Application During Ongoing Trial (horizon Issues)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Managing Judge should recuse himself for apparent bias in ongoing group litigation
- 2 Whether comments and findings in prior judgment (Common Issues) create a real possibility of bias for subsequent trials
Ratio Decidendi
The judge found that the legal test for apparent bias was not satisfied; the fair-minded and informed observer would not conclude there was a real possibility of bias based on the passages and conduct cited. The judge's comments and findings were within the scope of his judicial function, and continuity in group litigation is essential. No substantial evidence of bias was presented.
Court Disposition
Recusal application dismissed; judge will continue as Managing Judge.
Orders
- The Horizon Issues trial will proceed before the same judge.
- No stay or adjournment of proceedings granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment