Bates & Ors v Post Office Ltd (No.5 : Common Issues Costs) [2019] EWHC 1373 (QB) (07 June 2019)
The court has discretion to make an immediate costs order following resolution of Common Issues in group litigation, and it is appropriate to do so here. The Claimants were broadly more successful but not wholly so; a 10% reduction in their recoverable costs is justified to reflect the Post Office's partial success and its conduct in unnecessarily extending the trial. Costs are to be assessed on the standard basis. Interim payments on account are ordered based on the approved costs budget and incurred costs, and all costs (budgeted and pre-budgeted) are subject to detailed assessment.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 1373
- Parties
- Claimants: Alan Bates and others; Defendant: Post Office Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Group Litigation Order (glo) Costs Judgment / Post Trial, Consequential Costs Determination Following Common Issues Trial
- Outcome
- Costs order in favour of Claimants for Common Issues trial, subject to 10% reduction; costs to be assessed on the standard basis; interim payments on account ordered; all costs subject to detailed assessment.
- Legal Topics
- Group Litigation Orders, Costs Assessment, Interim Payments, Detailed Assessment, Standard Vs Indemnity Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Bates and others
Claimants
Post Office Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Group Litigation Order (glo) Costs Judgment / Post Trial, Consequential Costs Determination Following Common Issues Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs of the Common Issues trial should be reserved or ordered now
- 2 Whether costs should be assessed on the standard or indemnity basis
- 3 What proportion of costs should be recoverable by the Claimants
Ratio Decidendi
The court has discretion to make an immediate costs order following resolution of Common Issues in group litigation, and it is appropriate to do so here. The Claimants were broadly more successful but not wholly so; a 10% reduction in their recoverable costs is justified to reflect the Post Office's partial success and its conduct in unnecessarily extending the trial. Costs are to be assessed on the standard basis. Interim payments on account are ordered based on the approved costs budget and incurred costs, and all costs (budgeted and pre-budgeted) are subject to detailed assessment.
Court Disposition
Costs order in favour of Claimants for Common Issues trial, subject to 10% reduction; costs to be assessed on the standard basis; interim payments on account ordered; all costs subject to detailed assessment.
Orders
- Post Office to pay Claimants' costs of the Common Issues trial, subject to a 10% reduction.
- Costs to be assessed on the standard basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment