PQ v RS and others (Legal Parenthood: Written consent)
Errors in the consent form were obvious and did not reflect the parties' common intention at the relevant time; rectification is appropriate and post-separation conduct is legally irrelevant to the acquisition of parenthood under HFEA 2008.
- Parties
- Applicant: PQ; 1st Respondent: RS; 2nd & 3rd Respondents: T & V; Children’s Guardian: Jane Powell; Interested Party: Bourn Hall (‘The Clinic’)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Declaration of Parentage/non Parentage / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaration of parentage granted in favour of PQ; RS's application for non-parentage dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Legal Parenthood, Assisted Reproduction, Written Consent, Rectification of Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PQ
Applicant
RS
1st Respondent
T & V
2nd & 3rd Respondents
Jane Powell
Children’s Guardian
Bourn Hall (‘The Clinic’)
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Declaration of Parentage/non Parentage / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether errors in consent forms prevent acquisition of legal parenthood under HFEA 2008
- 2 Whether post-separation conduct affects entitlement to declaration of parentage
- 3 Whether rectification or construction of consent forms is permissible
Ratio Decidendi
Errors in the consent form were obvious and did not reflect the parties' common intention at the relevant time; rectification is appropriate and post-separation conduct is legally irrelevant to the acquisition of parenthood under HFEA 2008.
Court Disposition
Declaration of parentage granted in favour of PQ; RS's application for non-parentage dismissed.
Orders
- Declaration of parentage made in relation to both children in favour of PQ.
- RS's application for declaration of non-parentage dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment