Kennametal Inc v Pramet Tools Sro & Anor

Kennametal Inc v Pramet Tools Sro & Anor

A stay of the revocation order is not justified because the UK proceedings have concluded with a final judgment, no appeal is pending, and the claimant had the opportunity to raise the relevant amendments during trial but failed to do so. The Samsung v Apple precedent does not apply as there are no concurrent proceedings.

Parties
Claimant: Kennametal Inc; Defendant: Pramet Tools SRO; Defendant: Associated Productions Tools Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 April 2014
Procedural Posture
Patent Revocation / Post Judgment Application for Stay of Revocation Order
Outcome
application for stay of revocation order dismissed
Legal Topics
Patent Revocation, Stay of Proceedings, Central Amendment Application, Abuse of Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kennametal Inc

Claimant

Pramet Tools SRO

Defendant

Associated Productions Tools Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Patent Revocation / Post Judgment Application for Stay of Revocation Order

  1. 1 Whether to stay the order for revocation pending outcome of EPO amendment proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to suspend revocation after final judgment without appeal
  3. 3 Whether proposed amendments constitute abuse of process

Ratio Decidendi

A stay of the revocation order is not justified because the UK proceedings have concluded with a final judgment, no appeal is pending, and the claimant had the opportunity to raise the relevant amendments during trial but failed to do so. The Samsung v Apple precedent does not apply as there are no concurrent proceedings.

Court Disposition

application for stay of revocation order dismissed

Orders

  • No stay of revocation; revocation order stands