Praxis IFM Trustees (Nz) Ltd v Riva & Ors [2019] EWHC 3321 (Ch) (20 November 2019)
There is a serious issue to be tried as to whether Mr Zimmer is a validly appointed protector. Damages are not an adequate remedy. The balance of convenience favours granting an interim injunction to preserve certainty in trust administration until the matter can be heard inter partes.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 3321 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant: PRAXIS IFM TRUSTEES (NZ) LIMITED; Respondents: Adriano Riva & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Dispute / Ex Parte Interim Injunction Application
- Outcome
- Interim injunction granted
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Protector, Interpretation of Trust Deed, Interim Injunction, Private International Law
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PRAXIS IFM TRUSTEES (NZ) LIMITED
Applicant
Adriano Riva & Ors
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Trust Dispute / Ex Parte Interim Injunction Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Zimmer has been validly appointed as protector under the trust deeds
- 2 Whether the applicant trustee is entitled to interim injunctive relief restraining Mr Zimmer from acting as protector and removing the trustee
Ratio Decidendi
There is a serious issue to be tried as to whether Mr Zimmer is a validly appointed protector. Damages are not an adequate remedy. The balance of convenience favours granting an interim injunction to preserve certainty in trust administration until the matter can be heard inter partes.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction granted
Orders
- Mr Zimmer is restrained from acting as protector and from removing the present trustee for seven days or until further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment