Preferred Tubes Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC
The delay of 164 days was serious and significant. The reasons for the delay, including being a businessman, personal circumstances, and misunderstanding the process, did not outweigh the need to respect statutory time limits and the prejudice to HMRC. The appellant's grounds of appeal were weak and largely outside the tribunal's jurisdiction. Permission to bring a late appeal was refused.
- Parties
- Appellant: Preferred Tubes Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Application for Permission to Bring a Late Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to bring a late appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Late Appeal, Customs Duty, Import VAT, Safeguarding Duty, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Preferred Tubes Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Application for Permission to Bring a Late Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be granted permission to bring an out of time appeal against HMRC's decision imposing safeguarding duty and import VAT.
Ratio Decidendi
The delay of 164 days was serious and significant. The reasons for the delay, including being a businessman, personal circumstances, and misunderstanding the process, did not outweigh the need to respect statutory time limits and the prejudice to HMRC. The appellant's grounds of appeal were weak and largely outside the tribunal's jurisdiction. Permission to bring a late appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
Permission to bring a late appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to bring a late appeal is rejected.
- The appellant does not have permission to appeal out of time.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment