Jim Ennis Construction Ltd v Premier Asphalt Ltd
The Claimant’s claim is not statute-barred because the cause of action to recover monies paid in compliance with an adjudicator’s decision arises upon payment, not at the time of the original breach. This is supported by an implied term in the contract and by restitutionary principles. The limitation period runs from the date of payment, and the claim was brought within six years of that date.
- Parties
- Claimant: Jim Ennis Construction Limited; Defendant: Premier Asphalt Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (construction Contract Dispute) / Preliminary Issue on Limitation (statute Barred)
- Outcome
- Claim not statute-barred; preliminary issue determined in favour of Claimant
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Adjudication Under HGCRA, Implied Terms, Restitution, Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jim Ennis Construction Limited
Claimant
Premier Asphalt Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (construction Contract Dispute) / Preliminary Issue on Limitation (statute Barred)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant’s claim to recover monies paid under an adjudicator’s decision is statute-barred under the Limitation Act 1980
- 2 Whether a new cause of action arises upon payment in compliance with an adjudicator’s decision
- 3 Whether there is an implied term entitling repayment if the adjudicator’s decision is overturned
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant’s claim is not statute-barred because the cause of action to recover monies paid in compliance with an adjudicator’s decision arises upon payment, not at the time of the original breach. This is supported by an implied term in the contract and by restitutionary principles. The limitation period runs from the date of payment, and the claim was brought within six years of that date.
Court Disposition
Claim not statute-barred; preliminary issue determined in favour of Claimant
Orders
- The Claimant’s claim is not struck out on limitation grounds
- The proceedings may continue to final determination of the substantive dispute
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment