Sonact Group Ltd v Premuda Spa "Four Island"
The arbitration clause in the charterparty applied to the settlement agreement, as the parties intended disputes arising from the settlement of charterparty claims to be resolved in arbitration. The notice of arbitration was effective to refer the claim for the agreed sum to arbitration, and the arbitrators had jurisdiction to determine the claim.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sonact Group Limited; Defendant: Premuda SPA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Challenge to Arbitration Award / Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal, Incorporation of Arbitration Clause, Settlement Agreements, Voyage Charterparty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sonact Group Limited
Claimant
Premuda SPA
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Challenge to Arbitration Award / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrators had jurisdiction under the charterparty arbitration clause to determine a claim arising from a settlement agreement
- 2 Whether the notice of arbitration was effective to refer the claim for the agreed sum to arbitration
Ratio Decidendi
The arbitration clause in the charterparty applied to the settlement agreement, as the parties intended disputes arising from the settlement of charterparty claims to be resolved in arbitration. The notice of arbitration was effective to refer the claim for the agreed sum to arbitration, and the arbitrators had jurisdiction to determine the claim.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The challenge to the arbitration award is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment