Aird & Anor v Prime Meridian Ltd
On the specific facts, the joint expert statement was privileged as it was prepared primarily for mediation, and there was no clear and unequivocal waiver of privilege. Mere inconsistency between the statement and later pleadings does not amount to an abuse of privilege or unambiguous impropriety.
- Parties
- Claimant: Robert Aird; Claimant: Karen Aird; Defendant: Prime Meridian Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment on Application Regarding Privilege of Expert Statement
- Outcome
- Defendants' application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Without Prejudice Privilege, Mediation, Expert Evidence, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Aird
Claimant
Karen Aird
Claimant
Prime Meridian Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment on Application Regarding Privilege of Expert Statement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a joint expert statement prepared for mediation is privileged and inadmissible in subsequent litigation
- 2 Whether inconsistency between the statement and later pleadings constitutes an abuse of privilege
Ratio Decidendi
On the specific facts, the joint expert statement was privileged as it was prepared primarily for mediation, and there was no clear and unequivocal waiver of privilege. Mere inconsistency between the statement and later pleadings does not amount to an abuse of privilege or unambiguous impropriety.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application dismissed
Orders
- The statement is privileged and cannot be referred to in the proceedings unless both sides agree.
- Defendants to pay Claimants 80% of their costs, summarily assessed at £9,500.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment