British Waterways Board v Toor & Anor

British Waterways Board v Toor & Anor

The defendants failed to prove exclusive factual possession or intention to possess the alleyway for the requisite period; their belief in extensive rights of way was inconsistent with animus possidendi. The claimant is entitled to a permanent injunction to restrain trespass, as no exceptional circumstances justify refusal. Damages are to be assessed based on incurred fees, subject to further determination.

Parties
Claimant: British Waterways Board; Defendant: Pritpal Singh Toor; Defendant: Navtaj Kaur Toor
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Outcome
Permanent injunction granted; adverse possession claim dismissed; damages to be assessed.
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Trespass, Injunctions, Party Wall Legislation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

British Waterways Board

Claimant

Pritpal Singh Toor

Defendant

Navtaj Kaur Toor

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendants acquired title to the alleyway by adverse possession
  2. 2 Whether the defendants trespassed on the claimant's land
  3. 3 Whether a permanent injunction should be granted to restrain trespass

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants failed to prove exclusive factual possession or intention to possess the alleyway for the requisite period; their belief in extensive rights of way was inconsistent with animus possidendi. The claimant is entitled to a permanent injunction to restrain trespass, as no exceptional circumstances justify refusal. Damages are to be assessed based on incurred fees, subject to further determination.

Court Disposition

Permanent injunction granted; adverse possession claim dismissed; damages to be assessed.

Orders

  • Permanent injunction in the form ordered by Patten J (November 2005), excluding express provision for guttering work.
  • Damages to be assessed based on evidence and invoices unless parties reach agreement.