Ali v Bashir & Anor

Ali v Bashir & Anor

The petition complied with the substantive requirements of Rule 4(1) of the Election Petition Rules 1960, as it conveyed all essential information and caused no prejudice to the respondents. Strict adherence to the prescribed form is not required where substantive compliance is achieved, especially in light of Convention rights.

Parties
Petitioner: Mohammed Ali; First Respondent: Mohammed Bashir; Second Respondent: Ray Morgan
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 October 2012
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Application to Strike Out Petition
Outcome
strike out application dismissed
Legal Topics
Procedural Compliance, Form of Petition, Grounds for Election Challenge, Human Rights Compatibility
Election Law Administrative Law Procedural Compliance Form of Petition Grounds for Election Challenge Human Rights Compatibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohammed Ali

Petitioner

Mohammed Bashir

First Respondent

Ray Morgan

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petition / Application to Strike Out Petition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the petition complied with mandatory procedural requirements under the Election Petition Rules 1960
  2. 2 Whether substantive compliance with Rule 4(1) is sufficient despite deviation from prescribed form
  3. 3 Whether failure to adopt the Schedule form is fatal to the petition

Ratio Decidendi

The petition complied with the substantive requirements of Rule 4(1) of the Election Petition Rules 1960, as it conveyed all essential information and caused no prejudice to the respondents. Strict adherence to the prescribed form is not required where substantive compliance is achieved, especially in light of Convention rights.

Court Disposition

strike out application dismissed

Orders

  • Scrutiny of ballots and election documents to take place in Woking
  • First respondent to pay costs of petitioner and returning officer, assessed on standard basis if not agreed