Henshall, R (on the application of) v General Medical Council & Ors [2006] EWCA Civ 364 (31 January 2006)
The PPC's reliance on the British Medical Journal article was significant and affected the fairness of the proceedings against all three doctors; therefore, the complaints should be remitted for reconsideration under the proper procedure.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 364
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Deborah Henshall; Defendant/respondent: General Medical Council; Interested Party: Professor David Southall; Interested Party: Dr Andrew Spencer; Interested Party: Dr Martin Samuels
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From Administrative Court
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Professional Misconduct, Procedural Fairness, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Deborah Henshall
Claimant/appellant
General Medical Council
Defendant/respondent
Professor David Southall
Interested Party
Dr Andrew Spencer
Interested Party
Dr Martin Samuels
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From Administrative Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Preliminary Proceedings Committee's reliance on the British Medical Journal article constituted procedural unfairness
- 2 Whether the complaints against the doctors should be remitted for reconsideration
Ratio Decidendi
The PPC's reliance on the British Medical Journal article was significant and affected the fairness of the proceedings against all three doctors; therefore, the complaints should be remitted for reconsideration under the proper procedure.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Complaint remitted to General Medical Council's Investigations Committee under former statutory scheme.
- Appellant's costs of appeal to be borne by the General Medical Council, subject to detailed assessment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment