Boot v Boot & Anor [1996] EWCA Civ 1352 (19 April 1996)
The loan agreement satisfied the conditions of section 6(2) and the promissory note did not exclude the application of section 6; therefore, the limitation period ran from the date of written demand and the action was not statute-barred.
- Citation
- [1996] EWCA Civ 1352
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Colin Boot; Defendant/respondent: Pauline Boot; Third Party: Christopher Boot
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Promissory Notes, Statute of Limitations, Collateral Security, Repayment on Demand
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Colin Boot
Plaintiff/appellant
Pauline Boot
Defendant/respondent
Christopher Boot
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the cause of action on the promissory note was statute-barred under section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980
- 2 Whether section 6 of the Limitation Act 1980 applied to the loan agreement supported by a promissory note
Ratio Decidendi
The loan agreement satisfied the conditions of section 6(2) and the promissory note did not exclude the application of section 6; therefore, the limitation period ran from the date of written demand and the action was not statute-barred.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal allowed; district judge's order restored dismissing the summons to strike out the action.
- Defendant to pay costs of appeal to County Court Judge, not to be enforced without further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment