Banque Cantonale De Genève v Sanomi
The promissory notes are valid and enforceable under English law; oral evidence cannot be admitted to contradict their terms; forbearance by the bank constituted sufficient consideration; summary judgment is granted for the claimant for the outstanding indebtedness secured by the notes.
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Banque Cantonale de Genève; Defendant/respondent: Mr Igho Charles Sanomi
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Claim / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- summary judgment granted for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Promissory Notes, Summary Judgment, Consideration, Forbearance, Parol Evidence Rule, Negotiable Instruments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Banque Cantonale de Genève
Claimant/applicant
Mr Igho Charles Sanomi
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Are the documents dated 25 September 2015 valid promissory notes under English law?
- 2 Is the claimant entitled to summary judgment on the promissory notes?
- 3 Was there consideration for the promissory notes?
Ratio Decidendi
The promissory notes are valid and enforceable under English law; oral evidence cannot be admitted to contradict their terms; forbearance by the bank constituted sufficient consideration; summary judgment is granted for the claimant for the outstanding indebtedness secured by the notes.
Court Disposition
summary judgment granted for claimant
Orders
- Claimant entitled to recover up to the extent of the outstanding indebtedness of Taleveras to the bank secured by the promissory notes.
- Claimant to provide a statement of the balance when judgment is handed down.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment