David Smith v Stephen McCarthy

David Smith v Stephen McCarthy

Conceptual identification of the subject-matter of a trust or proprietary estoppel is sufficient where the property is identifiable at the time the trust is enforced. The district judge correctly found that the eight properties in the Anfield area of Liverpool, to be selected by the defendant, were sufficiently identified by the parties' agreement. The appeal is dismissed as the lower court's decision was not wrong in law.

Parties
Appellant and Defendant: David Smith; Litigation Friend for Appellant: Mrs Jane Staunton; Respondent and Claimant: Stephen McCarthy
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 January 2026
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Substantive Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Proprietary Estoppel, Constructive Trust, Certainty of Subject Matter
Trusts Property Law Equity Proprietary Estoppel Constructive Trust Certainty of Subject Matter

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Smith

Appellant and Defendant

Mrs Jane Staunton

Litigation Friend for Appellant

Stephen McCarthy

Respondent and Claimant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Substantive Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether conceptual identification of property to be acquired in the future is sufficient to give rise to a constructive trust or proprietary estoppel
  2. 2 Whether valid trust of residential properties within the Anfield area of Liverpool to be selected by the defendant

Ratio Decidendi

Conceptual identification of the subject-matter of a trust or proprietary estoppel is sufficient where the property is identifiable at the time the trust is enforced. The district judge correctly found that the eight properties in the Anfield area of Liverpool, to be selected by the defendant, were sufficiently identified by the parties' agreement. The appeal is dismissed as the lower court's decision was not wrong in law.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; district judge's decision upheld.
  • No need to address cross-appeal.