Puskunigis, R (on the application of) v Prosecutor General's Office Lithuania [2012] EWHC 3037 (Admin) (10 October 2012)
The appeal was dismissed because the only live warrant was valid, the Section 4(3) issue had been resolved, and the alleged conduct constituted extradition offences. The court could not consider factual disputes about the underlying offence.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 3037 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Puskunigis; Defendant: Prosecutor General's Office Lithuania
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Extradition Appeal / Appeal Against Extradition Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extradition Proceedings, Forgery, False Information, Procedural Requirements Under Extradition Act 2003
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Puskunigis
Claimant
Prosecutor General's Office Lithuania
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Extradition Appeal / Appeal Against Extradition Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requirements of Section 4(3) of the Extradition Act 2003 were breached
- 2 Whether the warrant under which extradition is sought is valid
- 3 Whether the alleged conduct constitutes extradition offences
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the only live warrant was valid, the Section 4(3) issue had been resolved, and the alleged conduct constituted extradition offences. The court could not consider factual disputes about the underlying offence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; extradition order stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment