Puskunigis, R (on the application of) v Prosecutor General's Office Lithuania [2012] EWHC 3037 (Admin) (10 October 2012)

Puskunigis, R (on the application of) v Prosecutor General's Office Lithuania [2012] EWHC 3037 (Admin) (10 October 2012)

The appeal was dismissed because the only live warrant was valid, the Section 4(3) issue had been resolved, and the alleged conduct constituted extradition offences. The court could not consider factual disputes about the underlying offence.

Citation
[2012] EWHC 3037 (Admin)
Parties
Claimant: Puskunigis; Defendant: Prosecutor General's Office Lithuania
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 October 2012
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Extradition Appeal / Appeal Against Extradition Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Extradition Proceedings, Forgery, False Information, Procedural Requirements Under Extradition Act 2003

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Puskunigis

Claimant

Prosecutor General's Office Lithuania

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Extradition Appeal / Appeal Against Extradition Order

  1. 1 Whether the requirements of Section 4(3) of the Extradition Act 2003 were breached
  2. 2 Whether the warrant under which extradition is sought is valid
  3. 3 Whether the alleged conduct constitutes extradition offences

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the only live warrant was valid, the Section 4(3) issue had been resolved, and the alleged conduct constituted extradition offences. The court could not consider factual disputes about the underlying offence.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; extradition order stands